If disagree with last post, don't send me "Look, guy related to Trump made a suspicious comment!", challenge my predictions or make your own
-
-
Replying to @slatestarcodex
Hi Scott, enjoy your approach to this stuff. Here are some predictions. What say you?pic.twitter.com/hXWUZRMDjB
4 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @puckthecat1
Agree with 1, 2a, 6, but all true of recent past admins. Think 2b is fault of ppl crying wolf. Disagree 3, 4. Unsure 5.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slatestarcodex
4 requires time parameter to be testable. 5 yrs from appointment&80% I would stand by strongly. Recently researched topic.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @puckthecat1 @slatestarcodex
3 we may have a straight-up testable disagreement.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @puckthecat1
Hi
@slatestarcodex. I know you got somewhat tired of dealing with this post--but have you given thought to your predictions?pic.twitter.com/8u79hQ4Q6k
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @puckthecat1 @slatestarcodex
I believe your 70% confidence cabinet prediction has failed. Hate crimes I think you're in danger on, but too early to know
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @puckthecat1 @slatestarcodex
Remainder of yours seem pretty low hanging fruit, with questionable causal link to Trump's decision-making.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @puckthecat1 @slatestarcodex
Feeling pretty good about mine.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Cabinet is exactly 20% if not counting VP, but I admit that's sketchy so fine.
-
-
Replying to @slatestarcodex
Fair point. Acosta replacing Puzder part of the story too.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.