One option is "shut up and let genetic methods improve to the point where it's bloody obvious".
-
-
Replying to @slatestarcodex @GarettJones
I agree with Garett- the only thing that can persuade those not yet persuaded is social proof, not GWAS math.
5 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @brendan_49 @GarettJones
"The Bell Curve" is a good example of somebody trying this too early. I think there are many advantages to (cont)
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slatestarcodex @GarettJones
The Bell Curve was too early for Murray's sanity but introduced innumerable ppl to the topic.
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @brendan_49 @GarettJones
And yet every time I bring it up, people say "But that's like the Bell Curve, and that was debunked and racist."
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slatestarcodex @GarettJones
It's not about the mass impact of TBC it's about its impact on the small fraction of researchers it inspired.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
There are whole journals where stuff is discussed openly. Researchers like journals and nobody bothers them there.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.