wait, do you mean you think there are a large number of population geneticists who ~agree with him?
-
-
I can't actually find where the data in the UNZ article comes from in the study, the part about what % caused by genes
-
Looks like it was from a prepublication presentation of the results at a conference; seehttp://www.unz.com/jthompson/genetics-genetic-groups-intelligence/ …
-
It seems that experts, on average, only think genetics account for 17% of cross national differences according to Rindermann
-
Yes, but on most ?s that's rated most important factor. See Rindermann paper, search "single countries and groups"
-
See also "The strongest rated factor across all countries...was genes-evolution (19.72%)"
-
Yes, it's the biggest *single* factor, but its still a relatively small factor. They said most variation is not due to genes
-
Seems larger for ethnic groups in West (Jews, black examples), but mostly I think there's a difference between (cont)
-
..between "Well, this doesn't explain ALL the variation" & "This is total pseudoscience and we should physically attack proponents"
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
i hope the ~90% non-response is mostly folks who realize how silly it is & that number would be even higher in pop gen
-
… but i'm doubtful on the first of those.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.