If you want we can even do your Twitter followers as long as they're not *all* nitpicky econ types.
-
-
-
Or if you know somebody else who can publicize to many people, that would be good too.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sorry, didn't catch answer. Do you agree that most readers will come away w/ wrong impression of support:oppose ratio?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If we agree that the article was misleading about % economists who are pro voucher, we have no disagreement!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe you want to make some fascinating point about the true meaning of "thesis", but I never wrote about that and don't care.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
All right. If your position can reduce to an empirical disagreement, make me a bet and I'll see if I accept.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes. Do you not think it matters what percent of people will get wrong impression from piece?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I am saying the article was phrased deliberately (?) misleadingly. Don't really care about semantics of whether falling (ctd)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If you accept that (almost) everyone would make the same "mistake" I made, I don't think we have a disagreement.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Oh, I see.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.