isn't writing essays on good/bad points of scientific articles what you do in your free time?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
a properly done CS review would usually start by summarizing what the article is about (to show you did read it)...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Usually you'd write a paragraph or two on good/bad points.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
...end with a clear and specific recommendation to accept or reject; in between you give whatever support for that you want.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A few short bullet points are enough to signal that you took it seriously; you don't need to waste an essay on it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Please take it seriously and do a good job. Try to raise the bar!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In computer science, you could get away with writing "seems okay" but it would be frowned upon.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Just attach your latest blog post and say "the paper should address the issues raised in the attached."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.