The claim in the studies I cited wasn't that IAT never changes, but that it does not reflect real behavior.
-
-
The individual test-retests are all over the place, but the mean is essentially identical
-
I'm not arguing internal validity, I'm arguing external validity.
-
The idea is that ext validity might be much higher if you could "denoise" the raw IAT scores through some kind of averaging
End of conversation
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.