@slatestarcodex more comfortable with women colleagues, less comfortable with women subordinates?
-
-
-
@slatestarcodex that's just a reframing of the question, but I think that framing suggests any number of possible hypotheses
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@slatestarcodex It'll be interesting to see how many citations each accumulates over time.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@slatestarcodex Difference in methodology: in the 1st, the study tells you to imagine a hiring scenario, the 2nd they believe it's for real -
@mulldrifting@slatestarcodex Yes, the older study is "no-stakes", because there are no possible personal/professional consequences. - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@slatestarcodex the 2012 study used a marginal candidate, the 2015 study used a "research powerhouse" - top women may be protected from biasThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@slatestarcodex maybe women who manage to get similar quals to men despite bias against female students are better academics.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@slatestarcodex all I'll say is whoever told them an abstract had to be 1 huge paragraph should be fired. Replacement of either gender OKThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.