Hard to overstate the damage these texts do to the credibility of the FBI probes of both Cling and Trump >> Peter Strzok, FBI agent removed from Robert Mueller's Russia probe, called Trump an 'idiot' https://usat.ly/2z4LRKI via @bykevinj
They give critics of the investigation an excuse to dismiss it as fundamentally partisan. For political purposes, it doesn't matter whether that is true.
-
-
This is only true if the media reports this without context. What effect did this text, this opinion, have on the course of the overall investigation?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"What is true or not is not my concern." Thank you for finally being honest. The media has a role in determining what the political reception is, and by god you're doing your job to mold it the "right" way.
-
One thing America definitely doesn't need is reporters trying to report on their own self-manufactured narrative. Is the investigation compromised or isn't it? If you won't write about that question then get a new job, one that doesnt allow you to cheerlead obstruction.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
the critics will always criticize, humans are infallible, they can have opinions and Mueller can remove them. Media needs to step up, make that point and move on. Full stop.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Of course—but it should matter. They couldn't substantively stand on their own without fundamentally partisan pundits disingenously fanning the spark. Intellectually dishonest.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They already dismissed the investigation as partisan because they are cynical and dishonest.Be better Paul
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.