.@singernews says Foley had more FB engagement than Malloy based on flawed data. Here's a week before Election Day.pic.twitter.com/i0ZQfiZIXy
@MikeNellis I disagree our data is "flawed." You want to make case that a different time slice is more meaningful - I'm all ears!
-
-
@singernews Your article insinuates that Foley had social media momentum when none is present. He was getting destroyed.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@singernews Now, it’s probably true that Foley increased his total engagement by X but it’s a bad indicator because he started from nothing.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@singernews Opposed to our team which had been building up big engagement numbers for six months prior. -
@MikeNellis that's fair. The question is, what metric is most indicative. Is it "best record in baseball" or "team peaking at right time?" -
@singernews The problem with the “peaking at the right time” stat is it ignores long-term building so I don’t think it’s a good indicator -
@MikeNellis I'm not sure it is either. But it seemed like a decent place to start the conversation. I view all this data as experimental. -
@singernews That’s fair. I may have come down too hard on ya. Post-election itching for a fight I think. Haha :) -
@MikeNellis wait - you were intemperate on Twitter??? What??? :-) -
@singernews Shocking!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.