"We should not [reduce] capitalism to a mere form of appearance of the more fundamental ontological attitude of technological domination; we should rather insist... that the capitalist logic of integrating the surplus into the functioning of the system is the fundamental fact."
-
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
On racial/random(/incel?) violence: "[We should assert] the speculative identity of these "useless" and "excessive" outbursts of violent immediacy, which display nothing but a pure and naked ("non-sublimated") hatred of the Otherness, with the global reflexivization of society."
Prikaži ovu nit -
Brilliant: "the fact that the upper level of Lacan's formula of the analyst's discourse is the same as his formula of perversion (a-$) opens up a possibility of reading the entire formula of the analyst's discourse also as a formula of the perverse social link..."
Prikaži ovu nit -
No obvious quote for the final discussion of desire vs drive, the cut vs the hole, the goal to attain the object vs the goal of endless circulation. But it's illuminating; Lacan's construction of the drive in Seminar XI is a bit... abstruse.
Prikaži ovu nit -
(Once I read thru Lacan's seminar on the 4 discourses, I will write up some sort of summary. Tough to wrap one's head around at first, but an incredibly powerful toolkit for interpreting the structure of discourses. I want to share it. The Zizek piece is difficult without it.)
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I do think that both
@SlavojZizekian and@JMELacanian as well as@KarlMarxian and@FNietzschean@SKierkegaardian really get what ψA is all about, whereas@CGJungian is just now catching upHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.