Preskoči na sadržaj
Korištenjem servisa na Twitteru pristajete na korištenje kolačića. Twitter i partneri rade globalno te koriste kolačiće za analize, personalizaciju i oglase.

Za najbolje sučelje na Twitteru koristite Microsoft Edge ili instalirajte aplikaciju Twitter iz trgovine Microsoft Store.

  • Naslovnica Naslovnica Naslovnica, trenutna stranica.
  • O Twitteru

Spremljena pretraživanja

  • obriši
  • U ovom razgovoru
    Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
Predloženi korisnici
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Jezik: Hrvatski
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • Ελληνικά
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Imate račun? Prijava
    Imate račun?
    · Zaboravili ste lozinku?

    Novi ste na Twitteru?
    Registrirajte se
Profil korisnika/ce simpolism
simpolism
simpolism
simpolism
@simpolism

Tweets

simpolism

@simpolism

Situational metacommentarian, dilettante postpostmodernist, Jaynesian idealist, futon psychoanalyst.

NYC
Vrijeme pridruživanja: rujan 2017.

Tweets

  • © 2020 Twitter
  • O Twitteru
  • Centar za pomoć
  • Uvjeti
  • Pravila o privatnosti
  • Imprint
  • Kolačići
  • Informacije o oglasima
Odbaci
Prethodni
Sljedeće

Idite na profil osobe

Spremljena pretraživanja

  • obriši
  • U ovom razgovoru
    Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
Predloženi korisnici
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @

Odjava

Blokiraj

  • Objavi Tweet s lokacijom

    U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više

    Vaši popisi

    Izradi novi popis


    Manje od 100 znakova, neobavezno

    Privatnost

    Kopiraj vezu u tweet

    Ugradi ovaj Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Dodajte ovaj Tweet na svoje web-mjesto kopiranjem koda u nastavku. Saznajte više

    Dodajte ovaj videozapis na svoje web-mjesto kopiranjem koda u nastavku. Saznajte više

    Hm, došlo je do problema prilikom povezivanja s poslužiteljem.

    Integracijom Twitterova sadržaja u svoje web-mjesto ili aplikaciju prihvaćate Twitterov Ugovor za programere i Pravila za programere.

    Pregled

    Razlog prikaza oglasa

    Prijavi se na Twitter

    · Zaboravili ste lozinku?
    Nemate račun? Registrirajte se »

    Prijavite se na Twitter

    Niste na Twitteru? Registrirajte se, uključite se u stvari koje vas zanimaju, i dobivajte promjene čim se dogode.

    Registrirajte se
    Imate račun? Prijava »

    Dvosmjerni (slanje i primanje) kratki kodovi:

    Država Kod Samo za korisnike
    Sjedinjene Američke Države 40404 (bilo koje)
    Kanada 21212 (bilo koje)
    Ujedinjeno Kraljevstvo 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Irska 51210 Vodafone, O2
    Indija 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonezija 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italija 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » Pogledajte SMS kratke šifre za druge zemlje

    Potvrda

     

    Dobro došli kući!

    Vremenska crta mjesto je na kojem ćete provesti najviše vremena i bez odgode dobivati novosti o svemu što vam je važno.

    Tweetovi vam ne valjaju?

    Prijeđite pokazivačem preko slike profila pa kliknite gumb Pratim da biste prestali pratiti neki račun.

    Kažite mnogo uz malo riječi

    Kada vidite Tweet koji volite, dodirnite srce – to osobi koja ga je napisala daje do znanja da vam se sviđa.

    Proširite glas

    Najbolji je način da podijelite nečiji Tweet s osobama koje vas prate prosljeđivanje. Dodirnite ikonu da biste smjesta poslali.

    Pridruži se razgovoru

    Pomoću odgovora dodajte sve što mislite o nekom tweetu. Pronađite temu koja vam je važna i uključite se.

    Saznajte najnovije vijesti

    Bez odgode pogledajte o čemu ljudi razgovaraju.

    Pratite više onoga što vam se sviđa

    Pratite više računa da biste dobivali novosti o temama do kojih vam je stalo.

    Saznajte što se događa

    Bez odgode pogledajte najnovije razgovore o bilo kojoj temi.

    Ne propustite nijedan aktualni događaj

    Bez odgode pratite kako se razvijaju događaji koje pratite.

    1. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      6. Skepticism: rats take a highly skeptical attitude toward knowledge, to such an extent that scientific studies which pass the bar of scrutiny are often (but not always) considered more reliable than knowledge gained from experience.

      1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 23 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    2. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      7. Rationalist: the rats are rationalist in the classic sense (which I will not be using throughout!) in that they attempt to apply reasoning to their conscious knowledge in order to determine how to act and what to believe.

      1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 17 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    3. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      8. This rationalist attitude of the rats is rather uncommon in the modern world, thanks to the popularity of hermeneutics of suspicion (e.g. "false consciousness", "the unconscious", etc) which draw into question the contents of our conscious knowledge.

      1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 25 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    4. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      9. Interestingly, the rats have their own quasi-hermeneutics of suspicion, in the form of "biases", which they consciously apply in order to achieve a higher standard of world-modelling capability thru reason.

      1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 22 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    5. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      10. The "rationalism" of the rats is likely responsible for their various attempts to create organizations and do activism (EA, etc): they want to manifest in reality their conclusions reached through reason. But how do they ground these conclusions, what is their ethics?

      1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 17 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    6. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      11. I call the rat ethics "universalist hedonic utilitarianism". Simply: utilitarianism = "maximize utility (well-being, goodness) in the world" hedonic = "conscious pleasure experience is good, suffering is bad" universalist = "everyone (or thing?) is subject to this ethics"

      0 proslijeđenih tweetova 27 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    7. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      12. The rationalist strain of universalist hedonic utilitarianism (UHA) varies according to who you ask, and is often a negative utilitarianism (only minimizing suffering matters). But it always retains a focus (via modern theory of mind) on "states of suffering" as bad.

      0 proslijeđenih tweetova 18 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    8. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      13. UHA has lead to interesting internal philosophical arguments, like: to what extent is the pain of animals comparable to humans? Can we convert between them? Can non-animals experience suffering? (incl. the infamous debate about whether atoms can suffer)

      1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 19 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    9. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      14. An element of rationalist philosophy that comes up a lot is the emphasis on Bayesian reasoning, as described in Eliezer Yudkowsky's "Sequences", a foundational text. It's an attempt to fix a "rationality deficit": _people are bad at understanding and applying statistics_.

      1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 17 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    10. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      15. The final element of the rationalist philosophy I'd like to address, and also the most controversial, is rationalist *eschatology*, in the sense of "man's final destiny". In particular, rationalists are concerned about *existential risks* (x-risks).

      1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 23 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
      simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      16. The rationalist philosophy posits, via thinkers like Nick Bostrom, that the rise of artificial intelligence has potential to destroy the world. A common thought experiment is the "paperclip maximizer", a paperclip-making AI that "accidentally" kills everyone in the process.

      15:25 - 15. pro 2019.
      • 2 proslijeđena tweeta
      • 23 oznake „sviđa mi se”
      • traitxr just deserts or justice hurts? 🇺🇸🇹🇼 Rahul Ramchandani Julius Jarlan Conor White-Sullivan🧢 satisfaction bronson (74%) urboibry eigenrobot Maxim ✈️ in SF for Config
      2 proslijeđena tweeta 23 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        1. Novi razgovor
        2. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          17. In a sense, the point of the philosophical ground in skepticism and rationality and UHU is to provide tools for modeling the entire world, such that, when universal AI comes, we might know how to avoid this paperclip end of the world.

          1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 16 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        3. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          ----I will pause here before returning to the postrats----

          1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 13 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        4. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          18. Jk, first I need to talk about community structure. The rationalist community has for over a decade converged around user-submitted content on the site LessWrong: https://www.lesswrong.com/ . Yudkowsky's Sequences were originally posted there.

          1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 17 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        5. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          19. Several long-running blogs have emerged from or intersected with this rationalist community space, such as Robin Hanson's "Overcoming Bias" http://www.overcomingbias.com/  and Scott Alexander's "Slate Star Codex"https://slatestarcodex.com/ 

          1 proslijeđeni tweet 20 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        6. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          20. The Rationalist community itself tends to converge in social spaces built around these main points of reference. There is a whole rationalist Tumblr sphere, and the public Slatestarcodex discord was my first point of entry into this world.

          1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 19 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        7. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          21. The result of the major centralization of written material in the rationalist space, combined with directly associated social channels, is that a set of strong common beliefs can form, a general picture of which I gave above.

          1 proslijeđeni tweet 23 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        8. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          22. This emergence of consensus on the Rationalist sphere is aided by their conversational norms: these spaces prize dispassionate intellectual conversation, as so to permit consideration of diverse topics that may fall outside the realm of social acceptability.

          1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 21 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        9. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          23. This willingness to avoid consideration of social acceptability has led to attacks on the Rationalist community. Media sources or motivated individuals (/r/sneerclub) love to accuse the discourse of ThoughtCrime. Scott Alexander has written about his suffering as a result.

          0 proslijeđenih tweetova 21 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        10. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          24. Our first point of departure into postrat is in terms of community structure. There is no postrat equivalent to LessWrong, thus the postrats lack a real canon. Some postrat blogs exist (e.g. http://ribbonfarm.com ), but most discourse is on Twitter or in group chats.

          0 proslijeđenih tweetova 26 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        11. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          25. Lacking a canon, a defining set of postrat views is hard to pin down. The typical postrat has negated at least one of the above rationalist qualities (either consciously or not), but which one they choose to negate varies.

          0 proslijeđenih tweetova 24 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        12. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          26. Ironically, this lack of definite ideology has become a key feature, perhaps THE defining feature, of the postrat community: "postrat doesn't mean anything!"

          1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 22 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        13. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          27. In practice, the main negations focus on the scientific-rational elements, leading postrats to think about topics such as phenomenology, ritual, meaning, etc, which cannot be easily studied experimentally or quantitatively.

          0 proslijeđenih tweetova 35 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        14. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          28. Most postrats also reject the eschatological claims of the rats, but not all. Many are skeptical of our actual ability to build a general AI, likely as a result of the tangles one finds when studying phenomenology and psychology.

          1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 23 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        15. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          29. A major element of discussion in the postrat sphere is the idea of "meaning". What matters anyway? If you remove the grand threat of a world-ending AI, this is a perfectly reasonable and common question to ask in our alienated world.

          1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 20 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        16. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          30. But we must still ask: why is the question of meaning of such great concern within the postrat community? What sorts of people are attracted to the rats, and what leads them eventually to the postrats? Are any of the solutions effective?

          1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 21 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        17. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          ----to be continued after dinner----

          1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 11 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        18. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          31. To continue, I want to sketch a general portrait of a rat turned postrat. This does not apply to everyone, as there's many reasons why one might engage with the communities. But I'm basing this on personal observations from the SSC discord, rationalist meetups, etc.

          1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 20 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        19. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          32. Many rats found their way into the community through Yudkowsky's book "Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality", which tends to resonate most with a particular group of late teens/early 20s who read Harry Potter growing up.

          1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 19 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        20. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          33. A general portrait of a newbie rationalist: intelligent but lacking engagement with the philosophical tradition, middle or upper-middle class, tech savvy, often socially alienated irl (and thus seeking community online), in late high school, college, or recently graduated.

          0 proslijeđenih tweetova 29 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        21. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          34. In terms of religion, the rationalists have a peculiar relationship with the new atheists, with the two groups bleeding together during the late 00s/early 10s. Many rationalists were either raised secular or rejected their familial/communal religious traditions.

          1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 19 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        22. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          35. In providing an eschatology and social circle, the rationalist community provides a meaningful community for those who seek it out. The willingness to ignore social bounds in conversation (low disgust) likely reflects a general social alienation that leads one online.

          1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 25 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        23. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          36. The most important attitudes that lead people toward postrationalism from rationalism are (a) boredom, a desire to go beyond the rat's demarcated sphere, and (b) an aesthetic distaste, as much rationalist art is somewhat contrived "nerd art" (Harry pottery fanfic?!).

          0 proslijeđenih tweetova 35 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        24. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          37. Regarding boredom, a consequence of having a canon and a centralized point for sharing work is that the rationalist philosophy takes on an orthodox character. This is ironic, since much conversational energy in rationalist circles is spent critiquing social orthodoxy.

          0 proslijeđenih tweetova 23 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        25. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          38. Many now-postrats, myself included, were uncomfortable with the sense of orthodoxy, of "given truths", and wanted to seek out more "interestingness" in topics that rationalists themsleves had little to say about, beyond how they were inaccessible to or solved by Science.

          1 proslijeđeni tweet 30 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        26. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          39. This desire for "interestingness" seemingly for its own sake is what led the "Intellectual Explorers Club" to describe postrats as "Insight Pornographers".https://medium.com/s/world-wide-wtf/memetic-tribes-and-culture-war-2-0-14705c43f6bb …

          1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 29 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        27. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          40. Interestingness also plays into the aesthetic preferences of the postrat sphere, who prefer to avoid the quasi-religous rationalist art in favor of less specifically targeted works, often classics or avant-garde. cf.https://www.ribbonfarm.com/2015/09/10/why-nerds-have-bad-taste/ …

          1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 27 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        28. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          41. My main point is that the rationalist meaning-wellspring failed on the postrats for some reason, whether they got bored and applied too much skepticism, or whether they failed to socially integrate such that a sense of intersubjective meaning could arise.

          1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 21 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        29. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          42. This failure to achieve meaning is, as mentioned earlier, a main interest of the postrats. Works like meaningness (https://meaningness.com/ ) and several of Sarah Perry's ribbonfarm pieces (e.g. https://www.ribbonfarm.com/2015/10/01/meaning-and-pointing/ …) have interrogated the topic extensively.

          0 proslijeđenih tweetova 22 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        30. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          43. As far as I can tell, meaning exists on a different plane of psychological existence than reason and rationality. I believe that the social experience of the rationalists can create meaning, but the logos of the postrats encourages a *return to the world* of experience.

          2 proslijeđena tweeta 37 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        31. simpolism‏ @simpolism 15. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          44. The statistical analyses and utilitarian calculus of the rationalists may be useful in governance, but to what extent can they stir an individual to enact life changes?

          1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 27 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        32. Još 17 drugih odgovora

      Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

      Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

        Sponzorirani tweet

        false

        • © 2020 Twitter
        • O Twitteru
        • Centar za pomoć
        • Uvjeti
        • Pravila o privatnosti
        • Imprint
        • Kolačići
        • Informacije o oglasima