Wait. What? John, if government regulation fails, then you are left with private greed. Also, government regulations seem way easier to kill than private greed, which appears eternal.
I do not support net neutrality. There is no reason to trust government regulation over private greed. When choosing the lesser of two evils, always choose the one that can be killed.
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
You just lost a follower on Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and Instagram. Tell your corporate buddies to kiss my butt.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I honestly expect more from you. As always I would appreciate to hear your thoughts, even if I'm on the other side.But drop the click bait
-
I've got a video coming out. Should be out by the end of the week. I do like that click bait though... ;P
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
All this is is a dispute between ISPs and content providers over whose customers should be stuck with higher prices. Somebody has to pay for bandwidth. It's a limited resource. Net Neutrality is just one side trying to use the force of government to tilt it in their favor.
-
> bandwidth is a limited resourcepic.twitter.com/gJKKQTYgOg
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
No way. Usually agree with you, but this is dead wrong. ISPs have a monopoly or near monopoly in most markets. If I can’t choose, free market doesn’t exist. Therefore, like all utilities (which ISPs are these days), regulation is needed.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If the ISPs weren’t already practically monopolies then maybe the free market would prevail, but that’s not the situation we’re in.
-
But government is an even bigger monopoly, so, there's that.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.