really? did he ask someone to calm down and have a conversation? that's just awful! he should be banned from using the internet!
-
-
Replying to @2xb @CHERdotdev and
Asking them to have a convo is one of the issues the others are completely ignoring the victim's experience and then supporting the abuser.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @john_codeinaire @CHERdotdev and
based on the level of civility of the mentioned thread, both sides could report being a victim. It simply spun out of control causing complete chaos. At the end, nobody knew exactly what was the premise of this entire conflict.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @2xb @john_codeinaire and
Anybody who didn’t know, didn’t want to know. The information is out there for anybody to find.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @tedneward @john_codeinaire and
that is a fair assessment, but is it how humans work in general? If that would be the case we wouldn't have the US govt fighting against fake facts/news published on social media skewing public opinions etc. All the facts are always there, right, and so far it didn't help.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @2xb @tedneward and
my point is -- assuming malicious intent of someone who asks both sides to sit down and talk is wrong. A good intention turned into a mess and this happens. Is this a reason to ban from conferences? I do not think so.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @2xb @tedneward and
I don't believe anyone was assuming malicious intent. Not that I can tell. It's the assumption that someone who was abused wants to sit down with their abuser to have a "civil convo". For HIM it's good in intentioned but if he just stop and thought for a moment he'd see it's...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @john_codeinaire @2xb and
Completely inappropriate and inconsiderate. No mediation was required. The abuser needs to stop being an abuser and take immediate steps to remedy the situation. Then he, Charles, continues to support the abuser. Now, I can see how peeps may believe malicious intent from that.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @john_codeinaire @2xb and
Sure, sure. An angry mob of the same people repeatedly abuse people who disagree with them and actively seek to cause them financial and emotional harm and I jump in and give them back some of their own medicine to defend someone and I'm the abuser.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @simpleprogrammr @john_codeinaire and
This is the problem with having one narrative without opposing views or giving the accused a chance to defend themselves. Mob justice. Whatever the mob decides must be right. Imagine if we conducted criminal trials in that way instead of depending on evidence.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Also, let's not forget that many people involved in this deleted their tweets. I have not deleted a single tweet this entire time and I will not delete anything.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.