John Sonmez

This is so incredibly dishonest. No one threatened Aimee's job, nor did highlighting what she said, and why it was problematic, threaten her job. John's behavior here was not out of character, as we proved with his misogynistic videos, abusive comments, and racist posts on FB.

And?

What does "yall gonna start being held accountable" mean? I think its a reasonable supposition that this is a threat of some economic or reputational harm... I doubt Kim meant going to Aimee's house and beating her up... lol

Ask Kim. This is not Kim's timeline. She is not even in this thread. And what does Kim's tweet outside of Aimee's thread have to do with the question?

I have seen multiple people express that they felt the way Aimee was being treated in the "twitter sphere" was abusive. I interpreted it that way as well. Not speaking to what you specifically said. But its a recurring pattern, someone says something people disagree with

And the people that disagree try to enforce some kind of reputational or economic harm to that person in the name of "holding them accountable" through, what is essentially, digital gossip (not assigning a negative connotation to the term "gossip")

So Im just saying Kim's tweet seems to be an example that supports this interpretation