The "Molar Berg" (#iceberg #D28) is getting together with the Stancomb-Wills Glacier Tongue for Christmas. No social distancing being practiced here, but no damage evident on either side so far.
Sentinel-1 images from @ESA_EO @Copernicus via @polarviewpic.twitter.com/Uy6JHimkRx
-
-
Some of
@planet's satellites got a nice cloud-free look at that region a couple of weeks ago. D28 mostly out of shot but you can see it's friend clearly (with the missing right-angled chunk, does that berg have a name?) https://twitter.com/simon_sat/status/1474394820097581062?s=20 …pic.twitter.com/ydThAh7xDe
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @simon_sat, @BBCAmos ja
Rob Larter uudelleentwiittasi 🇪🇺 DG DEFIS #StrongerTogether
D28 collected its entourage from an encounter with another fringing ice shelf during its odyssey along the Dronning Maud Land coast. That one looks large enough to have been catalogued.
@Readinger11 will know.https://twitter.com/defis_eu/status/1404349286041718784?t=aWDtkg7TeK2Ed3ZtvneZUg&s=19 …Rob Larter lisäsi,
🇪🇺 DG DEFIS #StrongerTogetherVarmennettu tili @defis_eu#ImageOfTheDay#D28 is an iceberg of ~2000 km2 that had been drifting undisturbed since calving in 2019 Recently, it impacted ice shelves in the Queen Maud Land area of#Antarctica creating 5 new icebergs
@CopernicusEU#Sentinel1
image acquired on 19 June

Animation pic.twitter.com/ZrhmjRlFQgNäytä tämä ketju1 vastaus 1 uudelleentwiittaus 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @rdlarter, @simon_sat ja
Left to right they are B39, D30A, D30B, D28, D29A, D29C, D29C. So is it D29A you’re seeing?
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @Readinger11, @simon_sat ja
Looks like it me. The other one seen following along in the gif animation I posted may be D29-C, and I think D30-A may be the iceberg that is already to the west of the Stancomb-Wills (not in the area covered in the images in the gif).
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @rdlarter, @Readinger11 ja
Ha, I should have looked more carefully at the
@defis_eu tweet I quoted - I hadn’t noticed the fact that the iceberg IDs were labelled there until you replied.2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @rdlarter, @Readinger11 ja
Just as soon as I can launch the Webb telescope, I have a Molar Berg feature coming. Just wondering whether Molar might headbutt the western Brunt. It would be typical behaviour from this boisterous bit of ice.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BBCAmos, @Readinger11 ja
The more immediate question is whether it is going to cause a large part of the Stancomb-Wills Glacier Tongue, which has been growing steadily for more than 60 years, to calve. The next question is whether the western Brunt will already have calved before D28 gets there.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Western Brunt has been nothing but disappointing for 3 years now? I have no input on any calving predictions. Given that A23A has been grounded near where D28 is heading for decades, it would seem likely it’ll get stuck too?
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @Readinger11, @BBCAmos ja
That could happen, but icebergs calved from the Filchner Ice Shelf, where A23A came from, generally have keels deeper than 400 m, where are ones from the Amery Ice Shelf, where D28 came from, generally have keel depths around 300 m or shallower.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys
If we know the freeboard can we estimate the keel depth? Might try to find some satellite overpasses to get the freeboard, assuming we ever get clear enough skies!
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjille @simon_sat, @Readinger11 ja
That's how keel depths are generally estimated. A correction should be made for the firn depth, but fortunately this should not be too large given the low accumulation rates around most of East Antarctica.
0 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäysKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
