Hot take: deep learning is slowly going to make large swaths of remote sensing research irrelevant. It takes a PhD to understand sensors and physics and ecology enough to write an algorithm to deduce crop type. It takes a weekend to train a deep learning model to do it.
-
-
This was my first thought.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
This is a huge part of what I always try to encourage when thinking about deep learning, it’s augmentation of human capability not replacement. Using DL to assist in data generation that indicate improvement pathways is valid, expecting to design new systems with it is not.
-
I also don’t think it’s valid to think of DL in a “train and forget” methodology, if it’s more accurate and captures new information/patterns then the questions to start asking are why, how can we understand that outside of an ML model, and can that be used to improve it?
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.




