No they are models/theories based on evidence/data. The difference is that when the data disproves a theory, scientists abandon the theory and don't think that is an easy discipline. Your entire career and reputation my depend on that theory.
-
-
Replying to @simon_enefer @KEEMSTAR and
“The difference is that when the data disproves a theory, scientists abandon the theory and don't think that is an easy discipline.“ How’s that “different”? If they’re willing to abandon it, they don’t view it as “objective truth.” It’s just the closest thing they have.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mediocre_danny @KEEMSTAR and
The communist experiment has been tried many times and always ended in tyranny, starvation and death. When will communists show some scientific method and accept they and it is wrong?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @simon_enefer @KEEMSTAR and
Have I not yet provided multiple examples of communism not ending in tyranny, starvation, OR death? That’s normally like, the first thing people ask. I like MAREZ as a fun example, they’re strapped all the time, yet they’re *still* not killing each other.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mediocre_danny @simon_enefer and
Anyway, capitalism kills 18 million people a year and has been responsible for genocides all over the world for the past 600 years. Why doesn’t anyone ever ask capitalists to admit THEY’RE wrong?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mediocre_danny @KEEMSTAR and
How does capitalism kill 18 million people? How about the hundreds of millions alive now because of the technological and medical advances it and NOT communism has created. Have to do better than that!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @simon_enefer @KEEMSTAR and
It kills them through starvation/dehydration while food/water is abundant, preventable disease when healthcare is available, exposure when there’s housing available. Hoarding. And that’s not even including the many millions that have died to protect the interests of capitalists.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mediocre_danny @simon_enefer and
To attribute ANY scientific advances to “capitalism” or “communism” is completely absurd. NEITHER of those have anything to do with the advancement of science, which has progressed in every kind of society.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mediocre_danny @KEEMSTAR and
2. No surplus of food and capital means no development and a nation one step away from famine.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @simon_enefer @KEEMSTAR and
Achieving a surplus of food does not require capitalism, and never did.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
1. Yes, Ancient Egypt could create surpluses, but not all the time. You may be interested that the first strike in recorded history occurred in Ancient Egypt, by craftsmen responsible for tomb construction. Middle kingdom I think.
-
-
Replying to @simon_enefer @KEEMSTAR and
Shortages happen under capitalism all the time, too. See: the entire third world
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes - 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.