I think you will find Derrida wa a Marxist too, at least in the sixties. Post-modernism is a reaction by Marxist to the failures of Marxism and Maoism. George Orwell put it best " They (socialist) don't love the poor they hate the rich".
-
-
Replying to @simon_enefer @KEEMSTAR and
Er, George Orwell was an *extremely* ardent socialist (https://www.biographyonline.net/socialism-george-orwell/ …), Ann Coulter was the one who said that. Orwell was an actual communist revolutionary in Spain, he just loathed Stalinism (in part bc Stalinists invaded Catalonia) and totalitarianism.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mediocre_danny @KEEMSTAR and
The quote is from The road from Wigan Pier. The best description of the psychology of Post-modernism is in Mary Renault "Bull from the Sea". Thesus considering Menthesus. Read the whole book, it's beautifully written otherwise the passage is in the last two chapters.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @simon_enefer @KEEMSTAR and
TRtWP is extremely pro-socialism, describing it as “common sense” and “the only remedy” to the ills of society. Orwell does refer to the “socialism of fools,” the support of the idea by naïve elitists who just hate the “hoggishly rich,” but argues they’re not “real” socialists.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mediocre_danny @KEEMSTAR and
How could a feeling person not sympathise with the sights Orwell saw. My family is working class, my father was working at 14. Materially we are infinitely better off, but there are real tragedies around us ever day. My experience homelessness in the UK shocked me beyond words
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @simon_enefer @KEEMSTAR and
Ofc— that sympathy is what pointed him towards socialism. In a modern, developed country, “socializing” property has the added benefit of ending homelessness, since it eliminates the paywall to acquiring a house. Some Leninist states & Finland have had success with that idea.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mediocre_danny @KEEMSTAR and
And how was property in Lennist states allocated? By need or given to good party members first? In the UK Unions leaders earning £70k plus live subsidized social housing whilst families earning less than £20k wait. How many homes did Castro, Stalin and Mao have?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @simon_enefer @KEEMSTAR and
It varies from state to state, it’s usually been handled by some sort of state bureaucracy with all sorts of restrictions. Which I still think is a crappy, broken system, but less crappy and broken than the housing market. They still housed non-party members.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @OhNoIts2016 @KEEMSTAR and
Without rule of law, a free press and democracy their are no checks to ensure the honesty of a bureaucracy or government. 2008 crisis Cause 1) deregulation of banking sector enacted by Bill Clinton 2) government backed lending to poor credit risks - NINJAS.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @simon_enefer @KEEMSTAR and
Many Leninist states are more “democratic” than the United States (not China though), but I don’t recognize either as a fully legitimate form of democracy. They have de facto ruling classes. I’m strongly supportive of a free press, strongly opposed to banks & the housing market.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
1. Which Leninist states are more democratic than the US? Elites will always exist. What matters is how they gain power, can they lose it, and is access to the elite limited by birth etc, and not merit.
-
-
Replying to @simon_enefer @KEEMSTAR and
Cuba, Laos, USSR until Stalin, and many defunct states
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mediocre_danny @KEEMSTAR and
Prior to Stalin is questionable, though Russia was recovering from WW1.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.