Where and when has he said something that is factually incorrect? Freedom of Speech and a right to the public square are important rights. Do you think the first person to oppose slavery was popular?
-
-
Replying to @simon_enefer @KEEMSTAR and
His factual errors and deliberate distortions are pointed out in literally every one of those videos. If you’re implying that BPS would have opposed slavery, I think that’s ridiculous.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mediocre_danny @KEEMSTAR and
Did you check the sources yourself? Or are you just listening to the SJWs who want to change our very language to prevent us thinking heretical thoughts. Post-modernism isn't a political ideology, it is a religion. Reject or leave the faith and you are not wrong, you are evil!
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @simon_enefer @KEEMSTAR and
Yep, I checked the sources. They’re conveniently linked in the descriptions!
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mediocre_danny @KEEMSTAR and
2. The New Scientist ran an article on a catastrophic break in the genetic make up of Europeans. This occurred about 7000 years ago. It concluded that the original male population was wiped out by invaders who then mated with the surviving women of the original population.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @simon_enefer @KEEMSTAR and
The New Scientist has a paywall, and all I’m seeing from them is articles about invasions by the Yamnaya, an ancient Eurasian hunter-gatherer culture who probably propagated the Proto-Indo-European language group. Which video is that supposed to support?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @OhNoIts2016 @KEEMSTAR and
That is the article! Well done. You would make an excellent researcher! Fast work. The article is fascinating as the timescales for the changes are very rapid.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @simon_enefer @KEEMSTAR and
Populations are a lot higher and more stable now than they were in the copper age though Also, invasions kill a whole bunch of people, whereas immigration... doesn’t do that
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mediocre_danny @KEEMSTAR and
Migration killed Rome which had its 2015 moment in 376AD. 250,000 Goths arrive requesting sanctuary and some thirty years later they sack Rome. This was never some deep conspiracy but the result if two very different cultures interacting.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @simon_enefer @KEEMSTAR and
I believe this is quite a bit of a mischaracterization. I should probably defer to a video on this one:https://youtu.be/BHW3Y_p2llo
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Stefan's video is flawed. Rome's elite lost faith in the idea of Rome. Contrast the 5th century AD elites too the elites behaviour in the 2nd Punic War. All members of Roman society risked everything to continue and win, in the 5th Cent they made deals or entered the Church!
-
-
Replying to @simon_enefer @KEEMSTAR and
Right, I just don’t think it’s accurate to portray the Goths’ sack of Rome as being caused by unchecked immigration, or even as the turning point leading to Rome’s fall. It was a much longer process than that, and the Goths rose up due mainly to abuse.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mediocre_danny @KEEMSTAR and
It is the number that matters! A few thousand the Romans could control, disperse and assimilate. 250,000 was just too many. The Goths kept their identity, seized regions within the Empire and demanded concessions. This is what is happening in Paris today.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.