body { -ms-overflow-style: scrollbar; overflow-y: scroll; overscroll-behavior-y: none; } .errorContainer { background-color: #FFF; color: #0F1419; max-width: 600px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 10%; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; } .errorButton { margin: 3em 0; } .errorButton a { background: #1DA1F2; border-radius: 2.5em; color: white; padding: 1em 2em; text-decoration: none; } .errorButton a:hover, .errorButton a:focus { background: rgb(26, 145, 218); } .errorFooter { color: #657786; font-size: 80%; line-height: 1.5; padding: 1em 0; } .errorFooter a, .errorFooter a:visited { color: #657786; text-decoration: none; padding-right: 1em; } .errorFooter a:hover, .errorFooter a:active { text-decoration: underline; } #placeholder, #react-root { display: none !important; } body { background-color: #FFF !important; }

JavaScript is not available.

We’ve detected that JavaScript is disabled in this browser. Please enable JavaScript or switch to a supported browser to continue using twitter.com. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

Help Center

Conversation

Šime

@simevidas

JavaScript Weekly incorrectly calls a WICG spec a standard.

A screenshot of the latest issue of JavaScript Weekly, in which the File System Access API is referred to as an open standard.

read image description

ALT

A screenshot of the File System Access API specification, which is a WICG draft and not a standard.

read image description

ALT

6:25 PM · Oct 9, 2020

Replying to

I guess it could be called a standard in the loose sense if there were multiple implementations. But with only one it can't even be called that. It is most definitely not a W3C Standard with a capital s or in the W3C Standards Track as the document itself exclaims.

Replying to

Might be good to add

to this discussion, though.