Simon Karg

@simanfication

🎓 PhD Student , studying topics in Moral Psychology with , and

Vrijeme pridruživanja: travanj 2015.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @simanfication

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @simanfication

  1. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    A great opportunity to work with fantastic people in a highly productive and cross-disciplinary lab

    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    26. sij

    This week brought together some of the best researchers in the world & representatives from tech, journalism and government. The goal: To find viable solutions for reducing the circulation of misinformation and hate on SoMe. Here is a thread on the key insights. [1/13]

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    24. sij

    "evidence that mindfulness itself can promote overt prosocial action" found by meta-analysis in press at Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (k = 29, N = 3100, g = .426, 95% CI(g) = [.304 .549])

    Poništi
  4. 24. sij

    It's a wrap! was a great experience for me, coming from the sidelines of moral psychology to discover this great field. Happy to see that will be a thing, in Copenhagen. Looking forward! Thanks to everyone organizing!

    Poništi
  5. 24. sij

    This connects to a wider points, which are both interesting. First, we need to know how the infrastructure of platforms favor incivility. Second, we need a better idea of how offline and online behavior interrelates.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. 24. sij

    Interesting question: what is the relevant counterfactual? - what other people would comment online? or - what the same people would say offline?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. 24. sij

    This also reminds me of a paper from and colleagues finding that moralizing language on twitter is generating more traction. Wondering what the relationship between moralizing language and toxic language is?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. 24. sij

    Another result from this: there seems to be a sweet-spot of toxicity. More Toxicity generates more traction (likes), but only up unto a point. This is also indicated by the comments that Facebook is featuring being higher in toxicity.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. 24. sij

    Even more striking is the difference between actual facebook posts with the survey comments. This indicates that people who do comment are actually outliers.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. 24. sij

    Are people who self-report to often comment on facebook also post more toxic comments in the survey? Yes.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. 24. sij
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. 24. sij

    and his team did a study on this. Present participants with a news story, and ask them to write a comment.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. 24. sij

    Thinking about comment sections, an important question to ask is: are the comments we observe (you know the youtube kind...) really outliers, or are they actually what the average person would write?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. 24. sij

    We're at the last talk at . is talking about online comment sections and how they fuel polarization and toxicity. Already has me relate from the start.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. 24. sij

    Another interesting finding: these interventions work most for people in networks who generally don't use a lot of hate speech

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. 24. sij

    The results: didn't help much, except for trying to highlight a shared religious identity with elite support

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 24. sij

    The content of tweets was manipulated based on several conditions

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 24. sij

    In a twitter field experiment, a fake account was set up that tweeted at people who had used a sectarian slur within the last 6 hours. This resulted in around 50 tweets each day for 20 consecutive days.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 24. sij

    The question now is, how can we decrease sectarian hate speech? Two studies might give an indication

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 24. sij

    The question is interested in: when does hate speech go viral? --> The biggest impact factor is accounts with a big following, like clerics, use hate speech

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·