It's trivial to block several distributed hosts simultaneously. An aspiring censor would simply find the most common federated endpoints for a given service and block all of them. Only the users of that software would be affected. There wouldn't be any collateral damage.
-
-
Tweet je nedostupan.
-
- Još 9 drugih odgovora
-
-
-
You might want to try spinning machines with new IP addresses every hour and pointing them by looking up a DNS record using DNS-over-TLS/HTTPS.
-
It's not possible, it's the SNI header that is used to drop connections.
- Još 7 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
So,
@AWS, what could you do to help@signalapp to help large populations whose human rights are being violated? What are your creative alternatives to a plain "nope, 'cause ToS", when it comes to protecting human rights? - Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Would it be possible for a collective of AWS domain owners to allow such fronting on Signal’s behalf?
-
If they were important enough customers to AWS, maybe?
- Još 8 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Sounds like a great fit for
@Cloudflare to get involved.Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
If you cannot find a better way to circumvent censorship, a way that is not illegally impersonating other websites you are just incompetent. Don't blame your cloud provider for upholding their TOS.
-
It was a workaround. How's circumventing government censorship a question of competency?
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.