It's trivial to block several distributed hosts simultaneously. An aspiring censor would simply find the most common federated endpoints for a given service and block all of them. Only the users of that software would be affected. There wouldn't be any collateral damage.
Amazon threatens to suspend Signal's AWS account over censorship circumvention:https://signal.org/blog/looking-back-on-the-front/ …
-
-
Tweet je nedostupan.
-
- Još 9 drugih odgovora
-
-
-
You might want to try spinning machines with new IP addresses every hour and pointing them by looking up a DNS record using DNS-over-TLS/HTTPS.
-
It's not possible, it's the SNI header that is used to drop connections.
- Još 7 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
So,
@AWS, what could you do to help@signalapp to help large populations whose human rights are being violated? What are your creative alternatives to a plain "nope, 'cause ToS", when it comes to protecting human rights? - Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Would it be possible for a collective of AWS domain owners to allow such fronting on Signal’s behalf?
-
If they were important enough customers to AWS, maybe?
- Još 8 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Sounds like a great fit for
@Cloudflare to get involved.Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
If you cannot find a better way to circumvent censorship, a way that is not illegally impersonating other websites you are just incompetent. Don't blame your cloud provider for upholding their TOS.
-
It was a workaround. How's circumventing government censorship a question of competency?
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.