Hey PMs & tech leaders, here’s a recording of my talk:
"The 7 Myths That Stymie PM Impact (& Careers)"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLH9xaerIB0 …
It covers some topics that don't get enough coverage, including:
Money vs Title
Confidence vs Competence
Problem Prevention (& pre-mortems)
Thread 
-
-
1st: Solving problems is good, but selectively preventing key problems is even better.
Prikaži ovu nit -
This thread (which blew up a bit when I first posted it) covers it in more detail, so check it out if you haven't already:https://twitter.com/shreyas/status/1218724150312751104 …
Prikaži ovu nit -
This is why problem solving is so enticing:https://twitter.com/shreyas/status/1218730766076534784 …
Prikaži ovu nit -
And this thread delves into pre-mortems, a key tool you can use for problem prevention:https://twitter.com/shreyas/status/1221257560033857536 …
Prikaži ovu nit -
2nd: PMs should definitely utilize their strengths, but they will have a greater impact and become better product leaders if they also address their weaknesses.
Prikaži ovu nit -
-
-
Learn more about this in this Tweetstorm:https://twitter.com/shreyas/status/1055725971163176960 …
Prikaži ovu nit -
3rd: You can increase your impact on the organization (and reduce the tremendous stress that often accompanies the PM job) by avoiding the trap of doing a great job on all tasks (and even features). Seek leverage, actively try to do a bad job for certain tasks. What!!?? Yes.
Prikaži ovu nit -
This deserves a Tweetstorm of its own, and I worry that some of the nuance will be lost as I summarize here, but I'm feeling brave today. Though better than reading it here, jump directly to this part of the talk:https://youtu.be/jLH9xaerIB0?t=1639 …
Prikaži ovu nit -
-
I often find that a large part of early/mid-career PMs' work stress is due to not recognizing this:pic.twitter.com/m6xkKyKxYK
Prikaži ovu nit -
-
-
-
Overhead tasks (note: you actually won't end up doing a *bad* job, but as a perfectionist, you should actively try to do a bad job so you end up doing an OK job, which is what such tasks deserve)pic.twitter.com/UNOzQCssfR
Prikaži ovu nit -
A nonspecific PM's to-do list, before using the LNO Effectiveness Framework: (not including the 4 hours of meetings they have today)pic.twitter.com/UPAZ0Pqii1
Prikaži ovu nit -
The same PM's to-list, after applying the LNO Effectiveness Framework: (now they're able to spend *more* time on the high leverage tasks than they would have otherwise, while still spending *less* total time to get through the tasks of the day)pic.twitter.com/CmsRts4Psm
Prikaži ovu nit -
A similar concept can also be applied to product features. Be intentional about what type of feature you're trying to build in a given context. Chiefly, once everyone's on the same page on the quality level you're aiming for, you can more rigorously resolve disagreements.pic.twitter.com/AQzkpy9Iy7
Prikaži ovu nit -
The most useful part of the Agreed Target Quality framework is the common lexicon. It works wonders when Eng–Design–PM are all aligned on the target quality for a given milestone. (I've adapted this over the years after first learning about it from
@jeffseibert at Twitter)pic.twitter.com/azlyiPkMAj
Prikaži ovu nit -
4th: Becoming VP Product / CPO / COO / etc. isn't the only path for high-performing PMs. And it might even be a terrible path for some. So, don't just chase the big title. And remember one key thing: Title and Money are not as correlated as you might think. What!!??
Prikaži ovu nit -
Jump to the part of the talk that describes how "LinkedIn Envy" pushes many high-performing PMs towards bad career decisions, why trying to emulate the "celebrity PMs" / 30-under-30 PMs is a bad idea, and what to do instead:https://youtu.be/jLH9xaerIB0?t=2265 …
Prikaži ovu nit -
5th: Pride in one's logical & analytical thinking can create major blind-spots for PMs and product leaders. You must understand the psychological factors that will influence your users' and customers' behavior. This applies to consumer products AND to enterprise products.
Prikaži ovu nit -
At this point, we get to the part of the talk where I leave exercises for the audience (and for you here). If you are a PM (or if work on products in almost any capacity), you must read "Alchemy" by
@rorysutherland.https://www.amazon.com/Alchemy-Curious-Science-Creating-Business/dp/006238841X/ …Prikaži ovu nit -
Another must-add to the PM bookshelf: In "Super Thinking", Lauren McCann and
@yegg describe hundreds of mental models that can help you become a better thinker and decision maker.https://www.amazon.com/Super-Thinking-Book-Mental-Models/dp/0525533583/ …Prikaži ovu nit -
Bonus PM book recommendation: "The Art of the Good Life" by
@dobelli is one of my top 5 favorite books of all time. It will make you a better PM and decision-maker (among other things).https://www.amazon.com/Art-Good-Life-Surprising-Shortcuts/dp/0316445096/ …Prikaži ovu nit -
Last one here: "The Art of Thinking Clearly", also by
@dobellihttps://www.amazon.com/Art-Thinking-Clearly-Rolf-Dobelli/dp/0062219693/ …Prikaži ovu nit -
#6: Don't assume that "PM-driven" companies are better for PMs. If you care about building superb products, you'll be better off at a company where Eng/Design/others have an *equal* voice in what product gets built. PM-driven companies are good for PMs' egos, but not much else.
Prikaži ovu nit -
The ego feels great when we’re in charge. But it almost always leads to worse products. When PMs are "calling the shots", largely based on their title, why should others care deeply about the product? So, seek "product-obsessed companies" and avoid "PM-driven companies".
Prikaži ovu nit -
Speaking of ego, if you want to learn more about shedding your ego and being an even-keeled PM, there’s no better book than “The Practicing Stoic” by Ward Farnsworth. (another one of my top 5 all-time favorite books, and also unconventional PM book reco)https://www.amazon.com/Practicing-Stoic-Philosophical-Users-Manual/dp/1567926118/ …
Prikaži ovu nit - Još 7 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.