J.L. Henshaw

@shoudaknown

Reading natural systems starts with finding what's growing, studied as cells of organization to understand the moves. Tweets

New York
Joined April 2009

@shoudaknown is blocked

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @shoudaknown.

  1. Yea, meaning a VERY different thing if you count both the impacts of tech and money or not...

  2. Wanting simple answers to more complex problems occurred while losing interest in things "complex".

  3. Wanting simple answers to more complex problems made us lose interest in things "complex".

    Embedded image permalink
  4. **The collapse of natural resource prices** shows the main plan for growth caving in, GOOD FOR EARTH, BAD FOR MONEY

    Embedded image permalink
  5. **The collapse of natural resource prices** shows the main plan for growth caving in, GOOD FOR EARTH, BAD FOR MONEY

  6. J.L. Henshaw followed and
  7. The earth does indeed still have MANY ECONOMIES OF DIFFERENT KINDS despite our ever exapanding disruptive energy use

  8. all impossible unless we remove the threat of our ever faster economic expansion

  9. 2000 GDP hit Earth like 10 million Hiroshima bombs of artificial energy use, toward 80 million in 2100, CO2 or not.

    Embedded image permalink
  10. 100% Net Zero ignores the EVER GROWING SCALE OF THE BOAST. Ever doubling has THE VERY SAME NET IMPACT as for !.

  11. ALL OUR CRISES need a SHIFT TO SCOPE-4 ACCOUNTING, to "shares of the whole", not "traced blame for the parts"..!

  12. and have COMMON ROOTS in the gross inequities of TRYING TO PROVIDE FOR AN INFINITE ECONOMY.

  13. In society after society, the "big cons" arise spontaneously, to satisfy our self images, fictitiously explained! :)

  14. If technology can't to solve it and energy impacts hard coupled to money: ln(e) / ln($) = c, ...can we avoid talk of natural growth?

  15. The real NEURAL CIRCUITRY LEADING TO SADNESS is obvious. It's our obsession with false magical thinking about the world we live in.

  16. tech can't solve it & growing energy impacts coupled to money: ln(e) / ln($) = c, All's left is to how to talk about ending growth!!

  17. Given , that tech can't solve it & coupling of growing energy impacts with money: ln(e) / ln($) = c, All's left is how to end growth!!

  18. Extraordinary community threats, like from , require extraordinary respect for people caught up in them.

  19. needs the [ e = m*c^2 ] Law of Sustainability: The Coupling of Ever Growing GDP and Energy Use Impacts: [ ln(e) / ln($GDP) = c ]

  20. The [ e = mc^2 ] LAW OF SUSTAINABILITY [ ln|e/ln|$ = c ] is "the share of growing energy to $'s impacts is const.

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

    You may also like

    ·