Shlomo Benartzi

@shlomobenartzi

Professor and Co-Chair of the Behavioral Decision-Making Group, UCLA Anderson School of Management, co-author of Save More Tomorrow

Los Angeles
Vrijeme pridruživanja: kolovoz 2013.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @shlomobenartzi

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @shlomobenartzi

  1. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Any organization that wants to engage customers and help them make better decisions should improve their digital design with an evidence-based approach.

    Poništi
  2. 3. velj

    In my latest piece for the we talk about the great impact that digital design has on human behavior. An example? The enhanced design of a 401(k) enrollment interface can drive an increase in contributions equivalent to +60% in the plan match.

    Poništi
  3. 22. sij

    I'm looking for a FinTech company to partner with for an innovative behavioral economics study on future self and financial outcomes that I'll be conducting together with and Read more here:

    Poništi
  4. 2. pro 2019.

    A new paper shows that CFO market forecasts are very overconfident—they vastly underestimate volatility—even after they get negative feedback. If pros are this bad, how can we possibly expect retirees to self-manage their finances and not run out of money?

    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Congratulations to 2019  Early Career Award winner Stephen Spiller ( ), whose reveals that even in the absence of misleading infographics, viewers' judgment can be swayed by chart data design.

    Poništi
  6. 30. lis 2019.
    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    BCFG Distinguished Senior Fellow wisely told us: "We should make the right choice the easiest choice." () Check out his 10/28 talk :

    Poništi
  8. 7. lis 2019.

    If people receive two numerical probability forecasts then tend to take an average (so 50% and 70% → 60%). But if they receive two verbal forecasts (likely + likely) then they tend to combine them, so that an even becomes “very likely”. A clever paper:

    Poništi
  9. 13. ruj 2019.

    One of the most used nudges in fintech doesn’t always work. Details are everything, experimentation is essential.

    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    11. ruj 2019.

    talks with about a reflection index he developed as part of Voya’s Behavioral Finance Institute for Innovation to help their participants increase their savings.

    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    9. ruj 2019.

    Attending ? Head to the general session tomorrow morning for 's keynote on how government can thrive in the age of the digital fiduciary.

    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    If you haven't read the article "Should Governments Invest More in Nudging?" yet, get to it! Apparently everyone else is talking about it... :

    Poništi
  13. 9. srp 2019.

    This interesting paper shows that changing the default repayment terms on a loan from 1 to 5 years led ~15% more people to choose a repayment term of +4 years. That would cost users minimum 470£ on a 10K loan :( Online design features are important!

    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Behavior change is hard! This episode of picks up on chronicling the work of the Behavior Change for Good Initiative that I co-direct with , featuring our work with & wisdom from

    Poništi
  15. 17. lip 2019.

    A blind spot known as “exponential growth bias” can lead people to save less and borrow more Check out my latest piece!

    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Professors Suzanne Shu and Robert Zeithammer () along with John Payne (), found that expanding the information presented to consumers about an annuity could increase demand without having to increase the payout as an incentive.

    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Professor () and () find that replacing cautionary by user-friendly language boosted worker contributions.

    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    There are four ingredients to facilitate adequate saving for retirement: availability, automatic enrollment, automatic investment, and automatic escalation. Read research from 's Richard H. Thaler and 's Shlomo Benartzi ()

    Poništi
  19. 24. svi 2019.
    Poništi
  20. 13. svi 2019.

    Interesting read by on the need for "sludge audits" in both the public and the private sector.

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·