Sheena Manku

@sheenamanku12

Stanwell Moor, United Kingdom
Vrijeme pridruživanja: listopad 2016.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @sheenamanku12

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @sheenamanku12

  1. prije 13 sati
    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    At the forthcoming consultation we will be telling that their own data shows Stanwell Moor will be affected by new noise: “A larger Heathrow may mean local communities will hear more noise from construction activities, from aircraft on the ground and in the air,

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    27. sij

    Unfortunately this report has used outdated figures. Gov now says 'onset of community annoyance' starts at 51LAeq not 57 used in the report; 51 still higher than the 45 figure WHO & the report want but the gulf between it & Gov standards less than claimed

    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Why are you flying so LOW! Every low flight increases heart attack risk and death? I truly can not understand people who work for a company that knowingly realise that people are dying because of them ...enjoy your day at work with the other sadists ....

    Poništi
  6. 27. sij
    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    27. sij

    Disappointed at the future plans of . See . Considering that the response to them from Heathrow and DfT is so dreadful (see ), will they offer any decent protection for the communities? If "yes", how? Socks pulling up?

    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    27. sij

    Jet noise affects more people than feared (£) - this study looked at the area around Gatwick but a recent ICCAN report said that assessment for Heathrow should be redone to include newly impacted communities & those who will suffer an increase in noise

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    27. sij

    "Research shows that aircraft noise is more ‘annoying’ than road or rail noise and that we are becoming increasingly sensitive to it"

    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    27. sij

    CPRE report: "The govt should include aviation emissions within the net zero greenhouse gas emissions target as recommended by the CCC & this should use a consistent approach that includes emissions above 3,000ft. Further aviation expansion should be ruled out on climate grounds"

    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    27. sij

    UK govt takes the number of people living within a noise contour of (averaged over a day) 57dB of aircraft noise as its measure. They try to ignore people outside this pretty arbitrary noise line. If they changed the contour to 45dB, there would be MASSIVELY more people included

    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    26. sij

    Crazy, environmentally, socially harmful schemes (without even economic justification) like HS2 & 3rd Heathrow runway should NOT be allowed to go ahead, just because UK government is scared of being seen abroad to have "lost its nerve" and has to impress abroad with "UK strength"

    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Plane noise night and day is torture and your team personally are responsible on vulnerable adults. How do you live with the guilt knowing break time damage..imagine this on your elderly parents...

    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    26. sij

    Remember do not be fooled by at that emissions from aircraft have limited effect on air quality. Inconceivable that they do not know of the post 2014 evidence that they cause substantial damage. See our article at

    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Even if Heathrow Expansion third runway doesn't go ahead there will still be more flights and less respite for residents. No avoiding WPOZ for Stanwell Moor

    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Sustainable legacy? You have to be joking! Stanwell Moor residents will be forced to endure increased noise, pollution and traffic, plus thirty years of disruption, yet we are not deemed worthy of any compensation. Two years of talks and

    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    25. sij

    How will airports adapt to supersonic passenger aircraft? This the terrifying question, terrifying for the planet and terrifying for the people suffering the noise and the pollution

    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    F**k me! People are being tormented with aviation noise and made sick ..children are deafened and OAPs risking heart attacks ...climates on fire and is a cause....let’s all go to the airport and watch the planes fly over residents and torment them ....🤓🤓🤓

    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    24. sij

    “Emissions from aviation have a global impact that cannot be ignored. The public has the right to access information on how emissions from aircrafts will be reduced and participate in decisions that affect their health and environment.”

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·