Shaun KingVerified account

Remember when you said there was no difference between Clinton and Trump, Shaun? Maybe you’re not the right guy for this.

No moral person who understands the cost of Bill Clinton's 1994 crime bill which imprisoned 100,000s of nonviolent minority members for decades could ever vote for Bill or Hillary Clinton. Trump is a clown. The Clintons are smart and evil.

You know presidents don’t write laws, right?

Bill Clinton signed the bill. It was his decision and his alone, that is why it is referred to as Bill Clinton's 1994 Omnibus Crime Bill. Go watch the video of Bill Clinton gloating as he signs it.

That would be the bill backed by the Congressional Black Caucus, right? A bill they wanted?

And the bill Bernie Sanders voted for?

Fans of the Clintons should read "Boys on the Tracks" by Mara Leveritt. Leveritt's book isn't a hatched job--she is a well-respected Arkansas journalist. I don't think Bernie is nearly as corrupt as the Clintons are.

After the threats we face, from Russia, from this President, from his violent supporters...your first thought is to attack the Democratic Party??

Because he is only about confusion and division.

@texasdemocrats are very active and vocal. They haven't been looking to national for jack. They have been moving things. Shaun stop with the games.

Is this the denial part of the grief process over realizing you have been a huge participant in the Russian propaganda effort to bring down Hillary and install Trump?

@ShaunKing was only retweeted 95 times, but @deray was retweeted 226 times and you say nothing. Why don't you just admit you're just an opportunist using this as an opportunity to attack those who you disagree with instead of actually addressing the underlying problems?

Beard...check Clueless white male privilege ... check

My position is that these retweets aren't a substanstitive argument to say the original author helped or harmed the propaganda effort. That's Candice's position.

Where did I say a single thing about retweets? Show me one place.

It's equivalent to your position (retweeted below) that the russians "weaponized" people and their positions on social media. How can their weaponization not include retweets of their posts?https://twitter.com/docrocktex26/status/965600463247892480 …

Holy stretch, Batman! So you've jumped from "Candice says only retweets prove Russian influence" to "Candice says no retweets are a part of the Russian influence." You're becoming hysterical.

what. You went from [Russians weaponized people's social media] when talking about SK but something about deray's tweets didnt help the russians at all (even though they were eager to retweet him for their job) That "something" is that you agree with him so he gets a pass.