9. NOTHING makes Trump more formidable than his social media following. He wields his 46.5 million Twitter followers, 23 million Facebook followers, and 8.2 million Instagram followers to not just dominate and shape every single news cycle, but to mock and ridicule his opponents
-
-
20. I believe just 3 people have the 4 factors to defeat Trump easily. Others could still win, but these 3 people would crush him. A. Oprah B. Michelle Obama C. Bernie Sanders Biden could win. Booker, Harris, Warren, Gillibrand could win Oprah, Michelle, Bernie would crush it
Show this thread -
21. I agree with every single argument that "we don't need another celebrity." But 2020 is not normal. The person does not have to be a celebrity per se, but to defeat Trump, to win back the news cycle, will take very unique factors that only a few people have It's where we are
Show this thread -
22. End of thread. We must not treat running against Trump like it's a normal thing. He's not normal. How he dominates the news is not normal. Defeating him will require a different approach. We could perhaps go back to normal down the road. But we're not there yet.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
e. Under 75yo.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So basically.... Bernie Sanders. I'm down.
#Bernie2020Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Or just don’t be named Donald Trump. That’s how you win. Not being named Donald Trump.
-
That's not going to work.
-
You know how many people told me they voted for Trump Bc they didn’t want Hilary? Choose a better suited candidate and Donald doesn’t have a chance.
-
That's what I'm saying, make sure whoever candidate runs against Trump is a damned good one, not just anyone and certainly not another celebrity.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Can we worry about this in 2019 why now
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Again sounds like
@SenSanders or@ninaturner Or@TulsiGabbard . Why does it have to be Oprah?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As much as I appreciate your wisdom on many subjects, I feel like you’re overestimating Trump as a candidate. The R primarys were stocked w/ exceptionally weak candidates. I think McCain or Romney would’ve prevailed. Most of the people I know who voted for Trump weren’t 1/
-
Trump supporters. A lot of them didn’t like him at all. But it is hard to explain how much some ppl in the Midwest & south *hate* HRC. When Bill was president, our preachers hinted he was literally the antichrist, & she was the awful shrew who enabled him & stood by him 2/
-
There are (otherwise) calm & rational ppl in my family who can’t even talk about her without literally shaking in rage. /X
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Wouldn't Bernie Sanders meet all of these
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
Nah—just not being a Clinton should be enough.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We had all that in 2016 but the DNC thought otherwise...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Then we're doomed, no such Dem Unicorn exists.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.