I’ll break this down later this week, but the first question we should ask is: Can this person beat Trump? I think the traditional rules are off in 2020. He’s a nebulous difficult opponent. He swats most opponents away like bugs.https://twitter.com/popchassid/status/950240199606460417 …
-
Disagree so strongly on this one. The first question should be if the person is qualified. Then whether they can win. Putting winning over everything else was literally Trump’s mantra during the election. We cannot fall into the same trap.
-
-
Again, not saying we shouldn’t also consider whether someone can win. It just shouldn’t be the first consideration. Either way, Clinton’s nomination was a sign we chose qualifications over “winning” which is why we even *deserved* the win. The ends never justify the means.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
She was qualified, but also a bad candidate. We need someone qualified who can win. The responsibility of a candidate is not just to win, but to govern well after winning
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't think he is saying she wasn't qualified. They just have to be qualified AND then a likable enough candidate to win the Electoral College.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.