You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
He acted as if he had an inside track to Jones' selection. He did not. I have ZERO respect for him.
Not a rumor. I spoke to many about very specific preferences, people, candidates, etc. We felt this type of pressure was very necessary. Not a single Democrat had a Black chief of staff before today. I stand by everything.
You spoke to many? Many from where? Did you speak to anyone actually on or in a decision-making position on the transition team?
Still waiting for the name of your inside source debunking it, you probably forgot about the previous thread, but just reminding you since you said you'd give a name of your inside source, Molly :) Don't worry, forgetting is normal, but I got your back!pic.twitter.com/PY85WotoGc
Some people aren't on social media 24/7. It might take days for the source to check her Facebook mentions. When I hear from her, I'll pass it along. :-)
Unlikely, but till then you effectively slandered him without any sources, kinda trust a global figure who even his enemies can't deny does his work in good faith over a random person debunking a world class journalist without any source who's best excuse is an unlikely IOU
Doesn't mean I won't accept the proofs, looking forward to it, honestly. Gotta stand behind my ideals and my words else I'm nothing. If the truth can destroy something then it should, but if you don't get said source, you'll likely forget again. But that will be your problem then
Oh my God, Molly, someone on the internet is judging you!pic.twitter.com/L3nxjLsYln
Thanks! If they are judging me as someone who sees through Shaun's BS, then more power to them. 
They can judge me as well. I suspected @ShaunKing was full of it when he posted the first tweet and I am convinced of it now.
You are full of it, Shaun. Read what you wrote here. You're admitting you didn't talk to anyone in a position to really know. You flat out lied about Jones, and all your acolytes are reading something into this response that isn't there. #FakeNewsShaun
Did you just #Bernarditize your impact on this result?
“Many people...”
"MANY people THINK he (Jones) MIGHT" .... If that is not "chumming" I don't know what is!
Of course you do. You set up the situation so either way you would get to criticize or take credit. Pretty convenient and definitely very Greenwaldian.
.@MsLaToshaBrown .@DeJuanaT .@TaranaBurke Keep up the pressure! Negative comments re this GREAT news are bots or the people -- & we know who you are.-- who hate to acknowledge any accomplishment they can't claim or are just never happy. Period. About anything. #HappyNewYear
No. Shaun. SMH
I would've also assumed Jones would have had an all-white staff, considering his attitude towards "bipartisanship" (pandering to the racists that voted for Moore) & the fact that people of color are appointed to these types of positions. I'm glad he decided to represent his /1
He never does say who these "many" were whom he consulted. We do know, though, that it wasn't Jones's people. He tries bluffing his way through this answer by saying a bunch of nonsequitors, and people read into it what they want. He should've said what you did, "I assume."
Fair point. I do trust he had an appropriate source, but you're right- it would be best to disclose his source.
Thank you, Shaun King. You are appreciated!
Yeah, whenever I see a tweet from him I NOW DIG DEEPER, BECAUSE ya know, BS!
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
