They’d probably extend the Garland Precedent to the vast majority of lower court nominees. New normal could well be judicial confirmations are at a standstill unless same party controls White House and Senate.https://twitter.com/chrislhayes/status/944034821487169537 …
-
Especially given the importance of judicial nominations to the bases of both parties. Who wants to go to their primary electorate and say, “I know we could have stopped those nominees, but we chose not to”?
-
-
The genie is out of the bottle on this stuff and I'm not sure how the Republicans make it right. They certainly seem to have no interest in making it right. They changed the rules. Now we're playing by them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If our judiciary is so polarized that it is life or death for both sides if the other one gets a "win," then there is something wrong with our judicial system that should be addressed. I think it is a symptom of a sickness, perhaps in the selection process.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.