This piece mischaracterizes why many folks reject lesser-evil voting. There's a tradeoff between building long-term power & going all in to prevent a worse short-term result. The decision to do either may be rooted in White privilege but also may be rooted in social justice.https://twitter.com/ShaunKing/status/938786971895369728 …
-
-
Thanks, Shaun! I still disagree with the premise that you don't have a choice, though, or that another option isn't "available." It seems to me that what you're really saying is that you think the cons of a short-term bad outweigh the pros of longer-term leverage, which is fine!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
What if we get into nuclear war and lots of people die? Would you change your mind then? If not, is there any circumstance in which you would have advocated voting for Clinton?
-
Yes. In fact, as I've said many times before, I would have had a harder time deciding what to do if Ted Cruz had been the Republican nominee, as I consider him to be far worse than Trump.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
I live in California so I voted third party. If I lived in a Purple state, I probably would've voted Clinton.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.