Don't worry everybody. It was a white man who slaughtered half of the church in Texas. That means everything is just fine. No terrorism
-
-
-
Banning or even tightening rules on guns wouldn’t change a thing. If a criminal wants a gun they’ll find a way
-
Hence why countries like the UK and Australia have a mass shooting prob.... Oh wait, they don't.
-
Ok. Let’s see the US take away all of the guns in circulation around the country. That’ll definitely stop people from acquiring illegal guns
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
It’s not difficult to acquire a gun illegally. Have you ever heard of the black market?
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
You’re oblivious. It takes 10 minutes or less to acquire a weapon on the deep web. Do some research. Gun control won’t shut that down
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Did they identify the shooter?
-
I think we have a hint by the way he whitehouse has responded
-
There's no need to identify the shooter. He's already passed the terrorist shooter skin test.
#Racism
pic.twitter.com/ksJIA219pL
-
Banning ppl on terrorist watch list from getting guns is supported by 89% of Americans. This why we can't call white people terrorists.
pic.twitter.com/6A3Ge6AKsJ
-
Guns don't kill people. People kill people. But the more guns there are. The more people get killed.
pic.twitter.com/LlurpQbrdI
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Oh, phew. Now the media can spend weeks dissecting how this fine fellow fell off the rails.
-
Weeks are for Muslim. A couple of days is what the “fine fellows” get. (See: Vegas)
-
Time spent on Muslim shooters is to unearth their dirty secrets. Time spent on white shooters is to try to understand why.
-
Well in the NYC mass killing the guy shouted allahu akbar and wanted to hang up an isis flag in his hospital room. Message received.
-
The Vegas dude didn't leave a manifesto and as of this tweet neither has the Texas shooter. So we are left asking wtf?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Oh so we got the "all clear" sign and can just send thoughts and prayers now? No need to talk about gun control?
-
He was DDed from the military - it was illegal for him to have a gun. He did anyway. What additional laws would stop that?
-
He clearly didn't obey laws, so no doubt he wouldn't have obeyed stricter laws...
-
Ok cool. Sound logic. Let's not talk about gun control then. He's just a rule breaker.
-
The government is LITERALLY around to regulate. Guns NEED REGULATION.
-
They are regulated. He couldn't legally own one and still did...
-
Which shows current laws don’t work- need a new stricter approach. Thanks for proving the point.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.