My Latest. Hardcore reforms - some achievable, some experimental, we should be fighting for if we are a democracy.http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/king-ways-create-representative-u-s-democracy-article-1.3320845 …
-
-
Also, with the proposed splits, we'd end up with more republicans in the Senate than you'd think.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I want to be in the part that doesn't contain Jerry Brown.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Geographically look at all the senators East coast has.....we have two! Or make East one big state and give two senators to them!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nope. It'd get split in a really messed up way. Besides, that's how the senate works. That's why we have the Senate and the House.
-
The imbalance is so drastic that it effectively disenfranchises people and economies.
@V_Fettke@ShaunKing -
Yeah, that 7 Californias plan was ridiculous. Ultimately, we're better together.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Why would you do that ?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There seems to be an almost Malthusian issue viz. population size and ability to govern effectively. Sub-countries w/in USA perhaps?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Then you break up Texas, Alaska and other red states.... The House is by population, Senate is 2 per. Makes sense.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Our state populations vary too here in Aus. But so what? One person one vote.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
Please elaborate. I still think it is a bad idea, but I'd like to know why you think it would be good.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Its already broken up. Many different school districts. I bet I know which districts will get the lions share of funds.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can't do it from a water rights perspective, also would create more republican senators
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
(Texan here) Texas could be broken up, also, but it wouldn't look as favorable. Also, isn't that why the two houses are different?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That means democrats would never again rule the US. I pray for that to happen.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sounds like a "great" plan, do you even live in the real world? Do you ever go out in public?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's often pandered as a joke but the Cascadia mov't (West. Wa, Oregon, Northern Calif. as a state) is getting serious.
-
The State of "Cascadia" would liberate the liberal Seattle/Portland's counties, but also stop swallowing the votes of the rural counties
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It would be nice to have more senators...we should concentrate on ridding ourselves of the electoral college first since it's a possibility
-
All you need is 2/3rd of the House, 2/3rd of the Senate and 3/4th (38) states to ratify an amendment.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.