If you owned human beings 200 years ago, If you slaughtered indigenous people 200 years ago, You should not be honored today or any day.https://twitter.com/ShaunKing/status/842003478092341248 …
My Latest. No President WHO OWNED HUMAN BEINGS should be honored or revered. Not Jackson. Not Washington. None.http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/king-no-president-owned-human-beings-honored-article-1.2998816 …
-
-
Where Andrew Jackson offers $10 to anyone who gives 100 lashes to his "runaway slave". Actually $10 for EVERY 100 lashes.pic.twitter.com/ZkZJMPOZ7p
-
Andrew Jackson was a horrible human Google ' Everglades Florida ' and dig around the old free books from the 1800s
-
sorry Google Books then query
-
i linked to a page thats cray but, the whole book is cray.... there are many other like books
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How about Presidents who slaughtered Native/Indian/Aboriginal/First-nations People and paid Americans scalp fees for committing murder?
-
This. Jackson was hailed as an "Indian fighter" and forced Native American removal. Parallels to 45's Muslim Ban.
-
temporary travel restriction or even banning an IDEOLOGY contrary to freedom is NOT genocide!!!!
-
Anyone who aligns himself with Jackson does so purposefully and with malice.
-
Jackson did understand the central bank problem. most everything else he was stunk.
-
OK. And? He was a racist! Jeezuz
-
Yes he was. I said everything else he did stunk. The ONE GOOD thing improved health of nation
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
internment of Japanese Americans (and Canadians) during the Second World War?
-
allowing war crimes during the first, second, Korean, Vietnam and Iraq war?
-
I think a * should be by every Prez's name with what happened under their watch. L
-
Lincoln wanted to emancipate slaves, but wasn't completely on board with freedom, that should be noted in HIS books
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Depends what "honored" means. If that means exerting Ad Hominem arguments over their ideas, I disagree.
-
that is to say, Ideas are either good or bad on their own, regardless of what the author did in his/her life.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Fine. Others will determine what to honor. Many acts today not acceptable today, were common 200 years ago.
-
also, if u really study George Washington, he was not particularly in favor of slavery but wife wow!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.