Biden is big money in the primary, corporate money in the general. Warren is people power in the primary, corporate money in the general. Sanders is people power in the primary, people power in the general, people power while in office. Who you gonna call?
-
-
-
Correction. Thanks to NY times reporting, we now know that Warren is big money in the primary too.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I don't like Rendell one bit, but he isn't wrong about this. Warren kickstarted her campaign with big money, and she has said she'll start taking it again for the General.https://jacobinmag.com/2019/09/elizabeth-warren-2020-big-donor-ban-bernie-sanders-corporate-money …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Better to be a hypocrite with ideas, than someone without any!
-
Agreed. Luckily we’ve got someone running who isn’t a hypocrite, came up with those ideas and has been fighting for them for generations. If Liz proposed half of the things she’s saying as a Senator, or endorsed the guy supporting those 4 years ago, she’d have way more cred.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Liz ain't got no original ideas either. Her only competition is Bernie. Now, she is literally trying to beat the people's candidate with a lame watered down version of his platform.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Looking at this comment section, glad to see so many Berners understand what EW really stands for. There for a moment I thought TYT was blinding large swats of Berniecrats into taking Warren seriously as their 2nd choice.

-
She is second to Bernie. Despite her flaws she is still better than all the other candidates.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That’s why we have a Bernie
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Biden's team is writing checks today that Biden might not be able to cash tomorrow
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He's right
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Depends on what their overall argument is. If it's about attending big
fundraisers at Martha's vineyard and then campaigning against Plutocrats then yes she's hypocritical. If it's about superdelegates then yesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
OMG! Joe is dividing the party!
~ #JoeByeDone Where are his 16 negative stories in 16 hours from Wapo? We will be waiting.
Joe:pic.twitter.com/TT5DwxOqekThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Warren has to reckon with her coziness with big money. She is campaigning against money in politics, but simultaneously takes it. If she believes its corrupting and takes it anyways, even she is saying shes corrupt. We're supposed to believe otherwise?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Someone needed to label her hypocrisy. For cripe’s sake, she was cushioned when she started the race using corp donors— $10M. Then she claimed that she would only take small donor funds for her campaign, and now she’s making backroom deals! Let alone Cherokee appropriation.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The writing is on the wall, the progressives have the all the energy. From here on out it’s gonna be subterfuge, smears and worst kind of sabotage. Even after we have the primaries. It’s gonna get ugly.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Leave it to the Dem voters to decide
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wow, they have taken concern trolling from social media and now put it in one of the supposed "papers of record". As if prefacing an attack with "I like this person" makes it have more teeth? What's next? "As a mother, won't someone think of the children?!"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.