When I see someone say, I won’t be supporting candidate XYZ because they voted for bill ABC in 2003, it’s an immediate tell for me that you aren’t being intellectually honest about your intentions. Critique vote XYZ, but EVERY candidate has had multiple BAD votes. Go deeper.https://twitter.com/shaunking/status/1079762559182356480 …
-
-
Sure...I'm more than willing to be surprised. But she has been out there a while. She's no Beto or Stacey or Andrew or
@AOC. There's nothing fresh about Elizabeth Warren. -
She’s consistent I’ve listened to her message in full Bread is fresh doesn’t mean that it’s good for you I’m so tired already of the division forming same thing happened with Hilary and now look where we are...
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Who should be excluded at this point are non-Democrats(Bernie Sanders) Iron sharpens iron, cream rises to the top...etc
I'm not worried about the candidates, but concerned about the politically under-educated & "needing to be inspired" voter @tmwinsett this is why we need 2yrs -
At this point, so very early, important to hear from everyone. Past elections have shown us some candidates we thought would be great weren’t, some who were shrugged out turned out to be strong. Getting maximum amount of ideas out there now is important IMO. Need fresh outlooks
-
Exactly. We (Registered Democrats) don't need outsiders trying to tear the family apart & then stand on the outside "finger wagging" at the dysfunction they helped instigate. We can do bad all by ourselves
Outsiders shud man-up & form their own party, if they "bout that life" -
...and the political experts like
@DrJasonJohnson should have to talk about something other than#TrussiaGate for the next two years
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Wow. 7 months?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.