Conceding doesn’t mean it’s over legally, does it? All norms have been tossed off planet anyway. If the numbers flip it, can’t he “un-concede”, or something? Real question.
I'm not so sure Andrew Gillum should've conceded. It's getting closer & closer.
-
-
-
No, not at all.
-
Do they not have a 50% rule to win outright?
-
I’m looking for the numbers now. Probably below 50% you can request a runoff.
-
Exactly what I was thinking!
-
Take a look at what this leading election security expert has to say:https://twitter.com/jennycohn1/status/1059992666547544064 …
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Concession speeches aren't legally binding. If he gets more votes, he wins, regardless of what he said.
-
this true?
-
-
Every single election it's Florida who can't choose between a buffoon and someone who's vote-worthy.
-
Texas: Hold my beer.
-
*checks Faisal's bio* Oops.
-
Watching this play out from Austria, I don't get the tradition of accepting a preliminary result as if it was the final one. As long as provisional or other ballots are still outstanding, i would report and view the result as preliminary.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Concession speeches are non binding :-)
-
Yes, they are just speeches. Votes are what matters. Hope the trend to Gillum continues.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Enough with 3rd party already.
-
Enough avoiding Rank Choice Voting, where everyone can vote their conscience finally. Third party is a worthy opinion; it’s flaws in our system that make it a wasted vote.
- 1 more reply
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.