Of course. That, plus the fact that after dealing with a black president for 8 years, they sure weren't going to elect one who was a woman.
-
-
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
*Least shocked face ever*
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
It seems to be a truism that often the more secure people are financially, the more likely they will use their vote to indulge their prejudices, instead of voting on the actual issues.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Duh of course. They just wanted to have cover so they blamed something else. Ask minorities we always knew what it was/is. We’ve seen it all of our lives and it looks the same as the 70s 80s and 90s 20s
-
This Tweet is unavailable
New conversation -
-
-
Who needed a study for this? We’ve always known this to be a FACT.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The survey asks zero questions about economic anxiety and the authors ignore that family economic loss is as strong a predictor as attitudes towards immigration. It seems that the authors just concluded what they wanted to conclude.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think when people invoke an economic explanation it's to explain non-voters.
-
Yeah, I think it’s clear Trump voters were motivated mainly by racial angst, non-voters by a belief (probably at least partially justified) that a vote for either party wouldn’t impact their lives. (Of course voter suppression also can’t be ignored.)
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
We knew this
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.