In February, when I did not forcefully denounce a friend, who did not forcefully denounce Louis Farrakhan, for him being anti-Semitic - that now means, through 6 degrees of Farrakhan separation, that I too am responsible for his words. Frankly, this is bullshit.
-
-
However lol to say that you’re not “responsible for anti-semitism of Minister Farrakhan “ would imply that what he says was actually anti-Semitic... when it actually wasn’t... and, you yourself would agree with some of his views especially concerning Palestinians..
-
The fact that he is at all mentioned in a false charge of antisemitism contributes to the larger propaganda to defame him. If folks have a problem with what the Minister has said they don’t have to go to you but the false charges shouldn’t be agreed by you either. Thats a problem
-
And thats where “staying in your lane” can come in. Because this is also dealing with a larger false charge that goes back several decades. And it’s not like Minister Farrakhan hasn’t explained himself already before lol to “denounce him” is that contribution..
-
A lot activists, leaders, politicians, etc find it easier to separate themselves with the truth rather than to speak it. To denounce someone without a true knowledge and understanding of what was actually said unfortunately shows what side you’re on.
-
And brother.... why do you follow Minister Farrakhan on instagram then ...? I’m confused
-
Thank you for your input. I didn’t know how to properly explain to my friend why what he wrote was troublesome and all I had to do was show her your tweets.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I don't agree that that is all you're trying to get at.
-
It’s also to ssg he’s anti-Semitic... which is again false.
-
Say* lol
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.