Shauna

Ok third name on the list is @HenryPoole - seems to be friends with child rapist apologist @lessig - also tweeted this approvingly https://twitter.com/jgbarah/status/832282512818741248 … It's not looking good

The fourth @fsf board member is Benjamin Mako Hill - @makoshark - seems super involved with Wikipedia, which is also known as an extremely hostile community towards women I guess I shouldn't continue to be surprised but I keep hoping

Who else is on the board of the @fsf? Let's see - Bradley M. Kuhn @bkuhn_ebb_org, Kat Walsh @mindspillage, and Alexandre Oliva https://www.fsf.org/news/alexandre-oliva-joins-free-software-foundation-board-of-directors …. Not much info on them. But who knows?! Maybe these folks will do the right thing and get rid of Stallman.

It's up to you, folks - you're the board of the @fsf. You can keep Stallman and alienate everyone else, or you can do your job. #cancelstallman @bkuhn_ebb_org @mindspillage @makoshark @gknauth @HenryPoole

Like clockwork, a @fsf board member, @gknauth is up in my mentions demanding "proof." YOU are on the board. YOU are responsible for investigating. Yet YOU are in my mentions making other people do your homework for you.

@sarahmei It is appropriate for me to ask, when you make slanderous accusations against people, to try to ascertain the veracity of your accusations. You, presumably, would have more information than I. Do you have information that would hold up under oath?

As a board member, it is appropriate for you to investigate issues raised about FSF leaders, yes. Calling them "slanderous accusations" and demanding info that "holds up under oath" is not part of a fair and objective investigation, & casts doubt on your ability to conduct one.

When I wrote late 12SEP, I was referring to a long string of tweets in May 2018. One person sends a lot of tweets about something she did not see first-hand. Everyone I consulted said tweets are just tweets. You can’t do anything if all you have is tweets by a non-witness.