Conversation

1. I'm genuinely wondering what the journalistic standards are for Trump palace intrigue stories As a non-journalist who interviews political figures, I'd never think to directly quote someone saying something if I hadn't heard it firsthand
57
489
2. If I wanted to convey what Kushner was saying or thinking and hadn't spoken to him myself, I'd attribute it to a source: "According to senior official x, Kushner said so and so, or Kushner thinks so and so." And, in any case, it would probably be paraphrased
5
90
3. The people I interview (Islamists, mostly) don't lie nearly as much as Trump administration officials, but I wouldn't trust them—or really *anyone*—to accurately "remember" the exact words of what someone said in a private meeting
7
147
4. I remember when I used to interview Jordanian Muslim Brotherhood figures and some hated each other and would talk shit about each other, so the idea that I'd directly quote a member of one faction secondhand based on what a member of the other faction told me would be nuts
Replying to
5. Again, I'm not a journalist, but if someone told me something so self-evidently absurd (i.e. Trump not knowing who Boehner is) I'd use basic judgment and not include it in any published material, or I'd say "Bannon joked that Trump didn't even know who Boehner was"
13
112
6. I mean come on, seriously. The Wolff excerpt, and a lot of what writes, are silly, fun, and have (some) glimmers of insight, but they can't really be considered "journalism," can they? It undermines faith in the media and contributes to "fake news" narratives
9
157
Sorry, one more thing, some folks are responding to this thread and asking me why I'm "defending" Trump. If this is considered defending Trump, then I'm at a loss. If something correct happens to portray Trump in a slightly less horrible light, that doesn't make it less correct
45
464