My least favorite trend on Rust RFCs are people who make arguments assuming that Rust will eventually become Haskell. Arguments like "what about HKT" or "consider monoids, semigroups, etc" or "this might confuse haskell programmers" are just so out of place.
-
I mean outside of RFC’s. Like where should people talk about how they would like to see rust develop long term?
Probably on the internals forum, but really I don't know how much value there is in that unless it's something structured roughly like an RFC. It's easy to talk about features that sound nice in concept without thinking through the motivations/consequences. Those are important.
-
-
I’m just asking because I think telling people not to do something without an alternative doesn’t work. You may not see value in it, but Haskell isn’t a newbie Lang, these people are smart & qualified and they see value in it. So maybe there should be a place to discuss.
-
This isn't specific to Haskell
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.