"Vec<!> should be a zero-sized type, since it has only one state" me: *nodding thoughtfully, reaching under table*pic.twitter.com/FrhuH8pDil
-
Vec<()> already blindly reports usize::max cap, iirc
-
-
I have no idea what you're implying
-
&'static String, we know cap always == len and never changes. Compiler could theoretically eliminate cap in other cases as well. Box would be the hard one
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.