"Vec<!> should be a zero-sized type, since it has only one state" me: *nodding thoughtfully, reaching under table*pic.twitter.com/FrhuH8pDil
-
-
Vec<()> already blindly reports usize::max cap, iirc
-
Tbh if the compiler could optimize that, &str could theoretically not exist
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.