This is one of many reasons I’m not supporting anything but Postgres with Lucky. Too many odd edge cases with other databases that take time away from more important thingshttps://twitter.com/sgrif/status/943620372695457794 …
-
Maybe I’ll make an adapter and LuckyRecord will officially support Postgres. The rest can be maintained by others. Did you try that?
I originally was thinking that would be the strategy. It just turned out to be too big a deal with nobody wanting to take up the reins. SQL Server (second most used) will end up as a third party adapter.