It's funny seeing people from Ruby rave about how good Rust's error messages are when I know 1000 ways to make it give garbage errors (and I'm running into all of them today). When they're good, they're *really* good, but when they're bad they're... Actually not any worse than rb
-
https://play.rust-lang.org/?gist=f0e3b04239b0d4a98bb19d0b5a0a3c1a&version=stable … is the example that's bothering me at this exact moment
This is actually 100% wrong. The hypothetical impl that I mention would always violate the orphan rule. Rust can 100% always say that the first impl doesn't apply. I have no clue why it doesn't use that knowledge.
-
-
My "I want the opposite of `#[fundamental]`" thing is still useful, but it would apply on traits not types (a local type in as a type parameter to a trait *is* considered local)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.