Of course the person who improperly disclosed the Apple vulnerability refers to themselves as "Agile Software Craftsman" >_____>
-
Improper/immoral/unethical/or basically "wrong" in any way.
I think the difference in my point is this: I don't see this as a disclosure, I see this as a disclosure to the developers working there who aren't magically more powerful than the developers working on OSS. I reject the notion that throwing more money at it fixes the problem
-
-
That does not make it OK that this happened, nor does it mean the reporter is responsible for the problem (that very squarely falls on Apple's shoulders), but I do think that it is only fair that the developers be given a chance to correct before it is made publich
-
That said, I think all disclosures should come with a timer. There are far too many stories of disclosures being ignored for months or even years
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.