Miss Dada  🏳️‍⚧️

One thing that is incredibly frustrating about certain classes of changes is that I have to implement 90% of it to find out if it's worth it

I'm incredibly lucky to be in a situation where I can go spend days or weeks exploring an idea that may amount to nothing (<3 Shopify)

I *think* I will have a significant perf bump for AR users this time though. I'll know for sure tomorrow (it involves @rustlang)

Now I'm curious.

I'll probably push most of the code up tomorrow. It's really not terribly interesting. Just a bunch of internal objects re-implemented in Rust, but specifically avoiding telling Ruby that the smallest objects exist unless we absolutely have to

One thing that I find very interesting though is that this means that `attributes[:foo].value` has a signficiant performance difference from `attributes.fetch_value(:foo)` even though the definition is just https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/daf77db65d9d5e295ee3ba86605988875cb834e4/activerecord/lib/active_record/attribute_set.rb#L46-L48 … in Ruby