Lol if your language has no type that can store a single character (looking at you C and Java)
-
ahem I think you mean ~*unicode scalar*~
I forgot that I have enough followers who actually implement unicode shit that I need to be specific >_<
-
-
Manish is right, you’re better off just closing your eyes and blitting UTF8
-
Oh I agree, I just think it's ridiculous (and actively harmful) to have a `char` type that is a UTF-16 code unit.
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.